Your work. Your records.

Log Graders and Scalers: Workplace Records

A disagreement involving log grading or scaling may concern a grade, a recorded load figure or the person who entered the information. Those are different facts. Organize your employment account around the event being questioned, the records available to you and your own role. Keep a later commercial or processing outcome separate from what you observed when the work occurred.

Call now(800) 800-5555

Free initial case evaluation. Representation depends on work state and case eligibility. This guide explains record preparation; it does not determine whether a legal claim exists.

A record map for your role

What to organize first

  1. Grade decision

    Identify whether you made, reviewed or were later told about the disputed grade.

  2. Data entry

    Distinguish your own entry from data entered or amended by another worker.

  3. Correction timing

    Record the original event and a later correction request as separate events.

  4. Employment effect

    Keep the permitted notice or communication explaining the workplace response.

Start with the work you actually do

Grade logs or estimate the marketable content or value of logs or pulpwood in sorting yards, millpond, log deck, or similar locations. Inspect logs for defects or measure logs to determine volume.

O*NET classifies this occupation as Log Graders and Scalers (45-4023.00). Its description covers a typical occupation, not every workplace or individual job. It does not establish employee status, overtime eligibility or employer misconduct.

  • Evaluate log characteristics and determine grades, using established criteria.Source task 9811 · updated 07/2017
  • Record data about individual trees or load volumes into tally books or hand-held collection terminals.Source task 9812 · updated 07/2017
  • Weigh log trucks before and after unloading, and record load weights and supplier identities.Source task 9820 · updated 07/2017

Identify the grade and the criteria discussed

Note which grading decision was discussed with you, who communicated the applicable criteria and whether you made or reviewed the decision. Record any request to explain or revisit the grade. If instructions changed, distinguish their timing from the earlier evaluation. Do not describe a later regrade as proof that the original work was improper without the relevant facts and authorized review.

Separate the recorded load from an individual entry

For a concern involving a tally record or handheld entry, state whether you entered the data, checked it or saw it after another person entered it. Identify when you reported a discrepancy and the response received. Leave supplier identities and proprietary load details in workplace systems. A personal account can describe the record and its location without exporting the underlying commercial data.

Keep scale corrections visible in the chronology

If feedback concerns before-and-after truck weights, note which record or comparison was discussed and whether you performed that part of the work. Separate the weighing event, an entry made later and any correction request. Do not recreate an unavailable weight from memory or change an original record to match a later estimate. Use your own permitted employment notices and correspondence to document how the issue affected your job.

Understand the occupational reference

The selected O*NET 31.0 entries describe evaluating log grades, recording tree or load data and recording truck weights before and after unloading. The entries are dated July 2017. They explain this guide’s work context, not a current scaling method or an individual performance standard. The suggestions help organize an employment account and do not resolve a grading dispute or establish a legal claim.

Choose your next step

Review the workplace retaliation guide, unpaid wages guide, or discrimination guide if those concerns fit your experience. A job title alone does not establish a claim.

Call now(800) 800-5555
Current service-state coverage

AK, AL, AR, AZ, CT, DE, FL, GA, HI, IA, ID, IN, KS, KY, LA, ME, MI, MN, MO, MS, MT, NC, ND, NE, NH, NM, NY, OH, OK, PA, RI, SD, TN, TX, UT, VA, VT, WI, WV, WY. Eligibility is evaluated individually; this list does not promise representation.

Explore state resources

Sources and editorial notes

Guide updated 2026-10-19. Occupation description and selected tasks: O*NET occupation profile, database 31.0. Individual task update dates are shown above; they can predate the database release.

This guide uses O*NET 31.0 data from the U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration, developed by the National Center for O*NET Development. YesLawyer selected occupational tasks and added workplace-record guidance; O*NET does not endorse this guide.

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 · Source database. The checklist and preparation sections are YesLawyer editorial guidance, not O*NET legal advice.